NYT: The Bride Wore Very Little
Those that have hung around this blog long enough know about my predilection for sexy brides (particularly when they’re being bent over and fucked in front of their husbands…but I digress). The newspaper of record today has a story on a great trend that, of course, I wholeheartedly support: sexy wedding dresses.
Cut away at the rear to reveal a tattoo at the small of her back, the dress suggested a languorous night in the honeymoon suite.
Gulp.
(Via Boinkology)
Related posts:
Posted by David | Feb. 21, 2008 | Posted in Wedding Night | 3 Comments »
3 Responses to “NYT: The Bride Wore Very Little”
Please leave a reply.
As noted no low-cut wedding dressing is quite complete without a tramp stamp.
I agree, saucemonkey. LOL
Once went to a prom with an ex gf and her best friend. They ended up trading dates and me and the other guy got a shot at the opposite girl (same room). I wonder how many XXX receptions see the groom’s men taking turns on the new bride while the brides maids keep the groom at attention during the show :)