Thoughts about cuckolding mentioned on Howard Stern
As covered yesterday by Fleshbot, cuckolding was introduced to the Howard Stern on his radio show by a porn starlet this week–and not necessarily in the best way, in my opinion. I mean even bad P.R. is good P. R., but the fact that it was explained by someone with obviously an unclear grasp of what it really means, and that definition of cuckolding was heard by a vast, mainstream radio audience. Plus after folks heard that the explanation grossed out Howard and the gang, this certainly won’t help it’s perception at all.
“Cuckold? What’s that?” asked Stern. He said he had heard of the term bukkake before, but had never heard of cuckold.
Lie Lani explained that - at least in the Kick Ass version - a cuckold is a humiliated husband who watches his wife have sex with a black man. “He cums in me,” she explained, “and then my husband has to eat the black man’s cum.”
Loud groans from Stern and everyone in the studio followed the explanation.
“I can’t believe there’s a term for that!” commented Stern show producer Gary Dell’Abate.
“So that’s what cuckold means!” said Robin Quivers.
“And this actor you worked with, he ate the black man’s cum?” Stern asked dubiously.
Lie Lani affirmed that he was very into it, prompting incredulous “Wows” from both Stern and Quivers.
So…now Howard and his listeners think that cuckolding is all about interracial cum eating. Great.
Look. I’ve got nothing at all against interracial cuckold encounters or cum eating, but I think it’s just too bad that this is how it was introduced in that venue. Cuckolding isn’t about those things at all. They are certainly powerful fantasies of a number of people that enjoy this fetish–but it’s certainly not the definition.
Thanks to Fleshbot for reminding folks how ridiculous it sounded.
Explanations abound online for what it means, but maybe we should begin formulating our own definitions of what a cuckold and the act of cuckolding are–and what they mean to us. Anyone care to begin the conversation in the comments?
Related posts:
Posted by David | Aug. 24, 2007 | Posted in Creampies, Cuckolds, Porn Industry | 7 Comments »
thanks good article. I can’t say that the person is wrong by what they said about cuckold, because to some that is what it is. Yet it would be nice if they put out that it’s there take on it not the full what is and is not. Thanks!!
The people who depend on Stern for accurate information are probably not worth worrying about. Great site.
Well put, JD. Still, whenever I see or hear it mentioned in the mainstream media like that, I always cringe a little.
Yeah I heard this on Stern. I was surprised to see that there was even a porn about cuckolding. They definitely made it sound all about the white guy eating a black man’s cum from her pussy. Not that I expect everyone to get the intensly erotic experience it is to share your wife with other men, watching her with her lovers, serving them. Don’t get me wrong I do get off on some of the humilation aspects but its not all the time. Sometimes it is just getting off on watching her fuck and sometimes it is getting off on serving her and her lover. It all depends on both of our moods. I’m sure there are a lot of guys who get off on this idea but are afraid to admit it or accept it, so I’m not surprised when a mainstream media show is like - Those guys are freaks.
Being open- minded is something that isn’t always popular. Most single men would rather have a threesome with two females or one night stands,while many married couples are monogomous,occassionally a threesome may be expressed and shot down lol. Howard understands that. Putting out eating a creampie is disgusting to the natural public,especially since it connotates homosexuality,due to eating another man’s sperm,regardless of where its at and why the need for it anyway.Whether that reaction was his intent beforehand or a natural reaction isn’t known.
Being a cuckold involves so many different aspects or so i’ve read. The husband giving up his sexuality to his wife and allowing her to do as she pleases,to an extent. If more was explained about this,Howard would have probally still remain puzzled about why a man would agree and be turned on by this.Why any man would stop desiring sexual acts or agree to it in limits is beyond most.
If you go online,so much is emphasized on the humilation,degradation, and replacement of the white husbands by bbc. Many of these husbands are bi or gay and have been replaced in the bedroom openly and even participate like the cuckoldress. That works for some couples.
A man that finds all the sexual satisifaction he needs in helping and watching his wife enjoy better lovers. That means that he does not sleep with anyone else and that his primary goal is to make sure that his wife is sexually satisified even though it is by someone other than him.
The majority of men may like watching or hearing sex,however they don’t want to be replaced sexually or be limited in how often they’re having sex.Being constrained is a definite turn on for many men and masteurbation,oral sex and intercourse is determined by the wife in this relationship. Giving a woman power over our private parts can only be done to those who are turned on by this and these men are normally submissive.
Getting some is what the male sexual mind is usually after,not how to snuff it out. Living vicariously through your wife isn’t the same as the physical act,nor does it feel as good.Ask any paraplegic or quadraplegic about that and you’ll see.
Hey, I don’t mind… maybe it will make more chicks get into it.
[...] unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerptHey, I don’t mind… maybe it will make more chicks get into it. [...]